Carbon dating is flawed
All IPCC definitions taken from Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Models are unreliable "[Models] are full of fudge factors that are fitted to the existing climate, so the models more or less agree with the observed data.
Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Annex I, Glossary, pp. But there is no reason to believe that the same fudge factors would give the right behaviour in a world with different chemistry, for example in a world with increased CO2 in the atmosphere." (Freeman Dyson)Climate models are mathematical representations of the interactions between the atmosphere, oceans, land surface, ice – and the sun.
Film and television have long had an equal representation problem, and a new website is here to address the issue.
Then, the numerical scores are averaged to give each series an overall letter score from A through F.
CO does explain that rise, and explains it completely without any need for additional, as yet unknown forcings.
Where models have been running for sufficient time, they have also been proved to make accurate predictions. Pinatubo allowed modellers to test the accuracy of models by feeding in the data about the eruption.
Testing models against the existing instrumental record suggested CO2 must cause global warming, because the models could not simulate what had already happened the extra CO2 was added to the model.
All other known forcings are adequate in explaining temperature variations prior to the rise in temperature over the last thirty years, while none of them are capable of explaining the rise in the past thirty years.
Every viewer should be invested in improving the film and TV landscapes, and it’s difficult to do that without some criticism.