Sex dating in westphalia michigan Free sex web cam plymouth uk
So even if they're OK with content being copied over, they might not want Iron Chariots to be I have Iron Chariots (and Rational Wiki) pages linked in several easy copy pastas I give to people to refute certain categories of arguments or teach them the underlying logic; IC sometimes covers thing in greater depth than RW and for my purposes I IC's tone is much better.I suspect many others share my appreciation for a "scholarly" go to resource to refute theistic claims; on RW you're always two clicks away from goat jokes.I want to know more about who actually writes Rational Wiki.
There are other users here with a variety of religious beliefs.(We sort of arsed it through with Evo Wiki ...) - David Gerard (talk) , 6 November 2017 (UTC) Thanks for finding that.The Iron Chariots Wiki license is CC-BY-SA-2.5, better if anything than Evo Wiki's CC-BY-NC-SA-1.0, and definitely compatible with our CC-BY-SA-3.0. (talk/stalk) , 6 November 2017 (UTC) It seems like a reasonable merge to me and can follow the strategy used for Evo Wiki.The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) , 9 November 2017 (UTC) I still think the questions from 1 to 9 are quite poor and it's very US-centric (I took the survey without submitting and had to look up "British equivalent of high school" for instance).
Christopher (talk) , 11 November 2017 (UTC) We apparently have an editor in North Korea who, being a white Hindu, is unlikely to be a native of North Korea and might well have clicked on Korea (North) instead of Korea (South) by mistake. It would be nice to have separate choices for country of origin and country of residence. And previous Saloon Bar conversations suggest that we have some Brits living in Spain editing here.
Iron Chariots Wiki appears to be on route to suffer the same fate.